Business and Management Factors Relating To Firm Innovation Performance

Authors

  • Dr. Naqeeb Ur Rehman Lecturer, Department of Economics, Hazara University Mansehra, Pakistan

Keywords:

Absorptive Capacity, Innovation, R&D, SMEs

Abstract

The resource based theory emphasise the important of knowledge based resources for firm innovation performance. This study identified the firm knowledge based assets such as R&D, absorptive capacity, knowledge management and so forth. This research paper analyse the Pakistani software industry (i.e., at micro level) and provided contribution to the knowledge in terms of analysis of knowledge intensive sector by using cross sectional data techniques.  This empirical study is based on 2-month survey of 69 software firms in Islamabad region. Factor and stepwise probit regression analysis are used to examine the relationship between business and management factors and firm innovation performance. Firm size, strategic focus, culture and knowledge management have a positive impact on the firm’s innovation performance. In comparison, lifecycle, leadership abilities and absorptive capacity have negative association to firm performance. Overall, our empirical findings suggests that firms with low level of R&D, resource constraint, poor networks and less motivated employees affect the innovation performance of these software firms.

References

Acs, J. Z. Anselin, L. and Varga, A. (2002). Patents and Innovation counts as measure of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy 31, 1069-1085.

Cohen, W, M, Levinthal D, A (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R&D, The Economic Journal, 99, 397, 569-596.

Correa M. C. (1996). Strategies for Software Exports from Developing Countries, Journal of World Development, 24, 1, 171-182.

Churchill, N and Lewis, V. (1983). The five stages of small business growth, Hardward Business Review, 3, 30-50.

De, S. and Dutta, D. (2007). Impact of Intangible Capital on Productivity and Growth: Lessons from the Indian Information Technology Software Industry, The Economics Record, 83, 1, 73-S86.

Freel S. M. (2005). Patterns of innovation and skills in small firms, Technovation, 25, 2, 123-134.

Gloet, M. Samson, D. (2012). Knowledge Management and Innovation Performance in Australian Service Sector Organisations, Conference Paper, 4032-4041.

Goetsch, D. L., Davis, S.B (2006). Quality Management: Introduction to Total Quality Management for Production, Processing, and Services, 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Harhoff, D. (1998). R&D and Productivity in German Manufacturing Firms, Journal of Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 6, 1, 29-50.

Harris, R. and Trainor, M. (1995). Innovation and R&D in Northern Ireland Manufacturing, A Schumpeterian approach, Journal of Regional Studies, 27, 7, 593-604.

Harris, I.D. R. and Reid, R. (2010). The role of knowledge in Lowering Barriers to Internationalisation, Discussion Paper, 1-33.

Hoang, T. D., Igel, B. Laosirihongthong, T. (2010). Total quality management (TQM) strategy and organisational characteristics: Evidence from recent WTO member, Total Quality Management, 21, 9, 931-951.

Jones, N. (2009). SME’s Life-Cylcle – Steps to Failure or Success?, Discussion Paper, 1-12.

Kaiser, H. F (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 141-151.

Katila, R. and Shane, S. (2005). When Does Lack of Resources Make New Firms Innovative? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 5, 814-829.

Koch, A. and Strotman, H. (2008). Absorptive Capacity and Innovation in the Knowledge Intensive Business Services Sector, Journal of Economics of Innovation and Technology, 17, 6, 511-531.

Leahy, D. and Neary, P. (2004). Absorptive capacity R&D spill over and public policy, Discussion Paper, 1-36.

Lumpkin G, T. and Dess G. G. (1996). Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking IT to Performance, Academy of Management Review, 21, 1, 135-172.

Matusik, F. S. and Heeley B. M. (2005). Absorptive capacity in the Software Industry: Identifying dimensions that affect Knowledge and Knowledge Creation activities, Journal of Management , 31, 4, 549-572.

Miles, E. R., Snow, C. C., Meyer. D. A. (1978). Organisational Strategy, Structure, and Process, The Academy of Management Review, 3, 3, 546 – 562.

Morris, T. and Pavett M. C. (1992). Management Style and Productivity in Two Cultures’, Journal of International Studies, 23, 1, 169-179.

Nold, A. H. (2012). Linking knowledge processes with firm performance: organisational culture, Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 1, 16-38.

Radas, S. and Bozic, L. (2009). The antecedents of SMEs innovativeness in an emerging transition economy, Technovation, 29, 6-7, 438-450.

Rejas P. L., Ponce R. E., Ponce, R. J (2006). Leadership styles and effectiveness: A study of Small Firms in Chile’, Interciencia, 31, 7, 500-504.

Sadikoglu, E. and Zehir, C. (2010). Investigating the effect of innovation and employee performance on the relationship between total quality management practices and firm performance: An empirical study of Turkish firms, International Journal of Production Economics, 127, 13-27.

Schiller, D. (2006). The potential to upgrade the Thai Innovation system by University- Industry Linkages, Asian Journal of Technology Innovation 14, 2, 67-91.

Sparrow, J. (2001). Knowledge Management in Small Firms, Journal of Knowledge and Process Management, 8, 1, 3-16.

Vanharanta, H. and Koskinen U. K. (2002). The role of tacit knowledge in innovation process of small and technology companies, International Journal of Production Economics, 80, 1, 57-64.

Wong, K. P., Lee, L. and Foo, D. M. (2007). Occupational Choice: The Influence of Product vs. Process Innovation, Small Business Economics, 30, 3, 267-281.

Zahra, A., George, G. (2002). Absorptive Capacity: A review, Reconceptualization, and Extension, The Academy of Management Review, 27, 2, 185-203.

Zahra, A. S. Hayton J. C. and Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in Family vs. Non Family Firms: A Resource-Based Analysis of the Effect of Organizational Culture, Journal of Entrepreneurship theory and Practice 28, 4, 363-381.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2021

How to Cite

Dr. Naqeeb Ur Rehman. (2021). Business and Management Factors Relating To Firm Innovation Performance. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 6(1), 78–90. Retrieved from https://ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/258

Issue

Section

Articles