Problems and Prospects of Rubber Plantation Industries in Dakshina Kannada District: A Case Study with Reference Harvesting Cost

Authors

  • Mr. Giridhara Gowda K. Associate Professor, Dept. of Commerce & Management, Nehru Memorial College Sullia, DK District, India
  • Dr. Sureshramana Mayya Associate Professor, MGM College, Udupi, Karnataka State., India

Keywords:

HS, ANOVA, Tukey HSD

Abstract

This study reports is the findings from a survey of rubber planters’ of Dakshina Kannada District of Karnataka. A questionnaire was administered to 50 rubber planters’ of Dakshina Kannada district in the study area. The analysis of the findings states that the calculated value of F differed significantly in Harvesting cost between different regions=8.011. The table value of F at 5% level of significance is 5.14. The calculated value is more than the table value and hence the null hypothesis is rejected which leads us to conclude that there is significant difference in the Harvesting cost in different regions.

References

Abdulla, T.M. (1968). Report of the Rubber Small Holding. Economic Enquiry Committee. New Delhi: Publications Division, Government of India. p. 120.

Abraham, K.K. (1990). Rubber Producers Societies. Rubber Enna Kalpadenu. Kottayam: Rubber Board. p.117

Abraham, P.O. (2001). Problems and Prospects of Rubber Based Industries in Kerala. Ph.D. Dissertation, Thiruvananthapuram: University of Kerala.

Anil Urs, (2008, September 10). Rubber Board Sets eyes on non-traditional regions. Kottayam: UPASI Convention.

Anju. et al. (2012). ‘Input Delivery, processing and marketing of Natural Rubber: The role of Producers Co-operative in Kerala”, Agricultural Economics Research Review, Vol. 25. pp 379-386.

Anon, (1871). Rules regarding grant of Land for cultivation of coffee. Memorandum of 8 March 1862; Rules for the sale of wasteland on the Travancore Hills. Travancore: Almanac. pp. 123-136.

Baak, P.E. (1997). Plantation production and political power: Plantation development in the South West India in a long term historical perspective, 1743-1963. New Delhi: Oxford University. p.370.

Baiman & Demski (1980). Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems. Journal of Accounting Research, 18. pp. 121-184.

Barlow Colin, (1978). The NR Industry-Development, Technology, Economy in Malaysia. New York: Oxford University Press.

Barlow, C. & Peries, O.S. On Some Biases in the Generation of Technologies by rubber Research Institutes. Journal of the RRI of Sri Lanka, 54. p.145.

Barlow, et al. (1994). The World Rubber Industry. London: Routledge. p.364.

Bauer, P.T. (1948). The Rubber Industry-A Study in Competition and Monopoly. London: Longman Green and Co.

Balakrishna Koila, (2008, November 25). Bumper Vegetable Crop in Rubber Plantation. Vijaya Karnataka Daily News Paper.

Bennett, (2013, January 5). Natural Rubber to remain firm in 2013 on improved economic activities. The Economic Times.

Bhaskaran Nair, K. (1988). Report on Survey of Rubber Cultivation in Madappally Village. Kottayam: Modi Rubber Limited, Rubber Development Project. pp.1-10.

Bhat, M. D. (1953). Report of the Revision of Prices of raw Rubber. Delhi: Manager of Publications, Government of India.

Bhattacharya Arabinda, (1976). Some Aspects of the Rubber Economy in Kerala. M.Phil. Dissertation. Thiruvananthapuram: Centre for Development Studies.

Budiman, A. F. S. (2008, Nov. 21-22). Global Price Trends of Natural Rubber. India

Downloads

Published

13-01-2022

How to Cite

Mr. Giridhara Gowda K., & Dr. Sureshramana Mayya. (2022). Problems and Prospects of Rubber Plantation Industries in Dakshina Kannada District: A Case Study with Reference Harvesting Cost. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 7(2), 31–35. Retrieved from https://ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/334

Issue

Section

Articles