Delegation and Coordination: Tools for Effective School Management


  • Dr. Purna Prabhakar Nandamuri Assistant Professor, ITM Business School, Hunter Road, Warangal-506001, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Dr.K.V.Rao Professor, Department of Commerce and Business Administration, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Andhra Pradesh, India.


School Based Management, Professional Management, Delegation, Coordination


There is an increasing awareness around the world for incorporating professional management into traditional public services. Similar trend has been encompassing the school education sector in the form of school based management. It would be appropriate to analyze the prevailing practices of school management in the context of similar reforms being initiated in India. This paper is an integral part of the doctoral dissertation in management area – ‘A study of Management Practices of Secondary Schools’. The objective of this paper is to explore the status of delegation and coordination aspects of school management. A sample of 188 secondary schools was selected through stratified sampling technique. The primary data was collected through self designed questionnaire and interview schedules. Chi-Square Test and simple percentages were used to analyze the data with the help of SPSS-17. The findings reveal that more delegation to be facilitated by the educational administrators. Despite the dearth of coordination committees, the nature of coordination between the school head and staff and among the staff members is good. The study suggests the policy makers to facilitate faster reforms and enhance accountability.


Amrik Singh (2001). “Wages of Maladministration.” The Hindu Daily - Openion.2001 May 24. New Delhi edition.

Bimber B (1994). “The Decentralization Mirage: Comparing Decision Making Arrangements in Four High Schools.” The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica.

Dakar Framework for Action (2000). “Education For All.” Proceedings of World Education Forum 2000, Dakar, Senegal. 26-28 April.

Drèze Jean and Gazdar H (1997). “Uttar Pradesh: The Burden of Inertia.” In Indian Development: Selected Regional Perspectives. Jean Drèze and Amarthya Sen (ed.s), Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp76-77.

Goertz ME, Stiefel L (1998). “School-level Resource Allocation in Urban Public Schools.” Journal of Education Finance, Vol. 23(4), pp. 435-46.

Hansen J, Roza M (2005). “Decentralized Decision-making for Schools: New Promise for an Old Idea?” The RAND Corporation, Santa Monica. CA.

Hanushek E (2002). “The Long Run Importance of School Quality.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper 9071. Cambridge.

IIEP (2000). “Decentralization of Education: Why, When,What and How?” In Fundamentals of Educational Planning. Edited by Mc Ginn and Welsh T. IIEP; UNESCO, Paris.

Karpade MS, Ashok K, Srivastava, and Meghanathan R (2004). “An Eextensive Study of Successful School Management in India: Case Studies of Navodaya Vidyalayas.” National Council of Education Research and Training, New Delhi.

National Knowledge Commission (2009). “Report to the Nation: 2006-09.” Govt of India. New Delhi, pp.14.

Pushpanadham (2006). “Educational Leadership for School Based Management.” ABAC Journal, Vol. 26(1), pp. 41-8.

Raju, K D (2006). “Indian Education Sector-Growth and Opportunities.” PHDCCI working paper N0. III, Jawaharlal Nehru University, New Delhi.

Singh Abhijeet (2006). “Public Sector Education in India: Challenges Ahead.” University of Delhi, New Delhi.

Stiefel L, Schwartz AE., Portas C, Kim DY (2003). “School Budgeting and School Performance: The Impact of New York City's Performance Driven Budgeting Initiative.” Journal of Education Finance, Vol.28 (3), pp. 403-24.




How to Cite

Dr. Purna Prabhakar Nandamuri, & Dr.K.V.Rao. (2011). Delegation and Coordination: Tools for Effective School Management. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 2(6), 78–82. Retrieved from