A Study on Influence of Life Style to Determine Brand Equity of Reliance Trends in Tamilnadu

Authors

  • Dr. K. Sethuraman Assistant Professor Department of Business Administration Annamalai University, Chidambaram, India.

Keywords:

striver, KMO value

Abstract

Today emotional spending is now based on wants not needs. Individual have used accessories as a form of nonverbal communication to indicate class and wealth affiliation. KMO value is good with the samples of brand equity having .722. Hence it is inferred that 400 samples with 26 variables having ability to extract factors. The brand equity variables have 54.75% of the characteristics. Based on the grand mean score believer having highest mean score of 4.49. So, it is consider as first rank, innovator having the mean score of 4.36, so it is consider as second rank, Experiencers having the mean score of 4.31, so it is consider as third rank, achiever having mean score of 4.20, so it is consider as fourth rank, striver having mean score of 4.10, so it is consider as fifth rank and maker having mean score of 4.00, so it is consider as sixth rank. Based on the grand mean score brand loyalty dimension having highest mean score of 4.32. So, it is consider as first rank, brand awareness dimension having the mean score of 4.31, so it is consider as second rank, brand association dimension having the mean score of 4.24, so it is consider as third rank, perceived quality dimension having mean score of 4.24, so it is consider as third rank. Experiencers highest scoring variables are trying new (.721), clarification variable having highest mean score of 4.60 and the internal consistency reliability .628 are satisfactory. Achiever highest scoring variables are trends and fashion (.775), score in-charge variable having highest mean score of 4.26 and the internal consistency reliability .652 are satisfactory.

References

Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing brand equity: Capitalizing on the value of a brand name. United State of America: Macmillan. Attitude: psychographiy. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2013, from http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Attitude_%28psychographic

Brand. (n.d.). Retrieved January 26, 2007, from http://www.answers.com/brand

Keller, K. L. (2003). Strategic brand managing: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education. Lifestyle. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2013, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lifestyle

Dobni, D. and Zinkhan, G. (1990). In search of brand image: a foundation analysis, Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 17, pp. 110-19.

Allport, G. W. (1935). Attitudes. In Murchison C. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 798–844). Worcester, MA: Clark University Press.

Sritharan R, and Samudhrarajakumar C. (2008). Loyalty Behaviour of Consumers' towards Non-Durable Products. SRM Management Digest, 6, 41- 46.

K Tamizh Jyothi and C. Samudhra Rajkumar (2005). An empirical study on the effectiveness of celebrity advertisements. Asia Pacific Business Review, 1 (2), 50 – 62.

Kailasam Tamizhjyothi and Samudhra Rajakumar (2011). Profession as a predictor of the effectiveness of Multiple Celebrity Endorsement – An Empirical Study in the Indian Context. Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Economic Science Series, 63 (3), 27 – 36

R. Sritharan, KT Jyothi, CS Rajakumar, (2008). Role of Involvement in Predicting Brand Loyalty. Asia Pacific Business Review, 4 (1), 44-58.

Downloads

Published

17-01-2022

How to Cite

Dr. K. Sethuraman. (2022). A Study on Influence of Life Style to Determine Brand Equity of Reliance Trends in Tamilnadu. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 5(1), 113–119. Retrieved from https://ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/473

Issue

Section

Articles