Employees’ Perception towards Organizational Success through Performance Management System
Keywords:
Performance Management system, Organizational success, Employee perceptionAbstract
Since the success of Performance Management System (PMS) depends very much on the human factor, an attempt was made to study the overall Perception of the employee’s towards implementation of PMS and organization success through PMS, IT sectors in Karnataka State. An analysis of findings indicates that 66%of the respondents opined that implementation of PMS is a must, 10.9% of them opined that it is necessary, 7.8% of them opined that it is not necessary and 15.2% of them opined that it is not at all necessary. Chi-Square Test shows that there is significance difference in the amount of responses (p<0.0001). So it is concluded that implementation of PMS is a must in the organization. However, we should also take into consideration that almost one-forth of the respondents oppose the presence of PMS, which is relatively a high proportion. The overall percentage Mean 76.19 denotes good perception towards organization success. Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) shows that there is a significant difference (p<0.001, HS) in perception among the various components of organizational success. In other words, components such as PMS is better than traditional performance appraisal, PMS aims at introducing innovative technology and methods to achieve organizational goal, PMS is effective in an organization and a good employee performance appraisal system is a pre-requisite for an effective PMS, contributes higher mean perception than PMS is only an alternative for management success, PMS helps in reducing strain, de-motivation and conflicts among employees and PMS is implemented and followed properly. The overall percentage Mean 76.19 denotes very good perception towards organizational success. So perception towards organizational success is positive as 76.19% falls in the category of 75% to 100%.
References
Armstrong, M, Baron B. (2002), “Performance management: The New Realities, Jaico Publishing House. Mumbai
Armstrong, M. (2005), “A Hand Book of Reward Management Practice”, Kogan Page India Pvt. Ltd. New Delhi.
Audit Commission. (2000a), “Aiming to Improve: the principles of performance measurement”, Audit Commission: 18.
Bernardin J.H. (2003), “Human resource Management: A experiential approach”, Tata McGraw-Hill. New Delhi.
Buckley, R. A Cabble, J. (1991), “One-to-one training and coaching skills”, Kogan Page Ltd. London.
Centre for Business Performance (2006), “Literature Review on Performance Measurement and Management”, Agency, Improvement and Development Agency: 39.
Drucker, P. (1995), “The Practice of Management”, Heinemann. London.
Edwin B. Flippo. (1984), “Personnel Management”, McGraw-Hill. International Edition.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P. (1996), “Translating strategy into action. The Balanced Scorecard”, Harvard Business School. Boston, Massachusetts.
Lockett, J. (1992), “Effective Performance Management: A strategic guide to getting the best from people”, Kogan page Ltd. London.
Mosley, H., et al. (2001), “Management by Objectives in European Public Employment Services”, Berlin.
Neely, A., et al. (1995), “Performance measurement system design, A literature review and research agenda”, International Journal of Operations & production management. 15: pp. 80-116.
Rao. T.V (1999), “Appraising Developing Managerial Performance”, Excel Publications. New Delhi.
Rao V.S.P. (1982), “Human Resource development”, Excel Publications, New Delhi.
Sahu, R.K. (2007), “Performance Management”, Excel Publications. New Delhi.
Shashi K. Gupta and Rosy Joshi, (2002), “Human Resource Management”, Kalyani Publishers. New Delhi.
