An Overview of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models in the aftermath of COVID-19


  • Dr. Arif Anjum Assistant Professor in Commerce, MGV’s Arts, Commerce and Science College, Malegaon City, Maharashtra, India


Technology acceptance model, technology adoption, COVID-19, pandemic, Fintech, perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use


Purpose: Technology adoption and its acceptance models have been investigated in different perceptions, encompassing various variables that suit the needs and requirements of the end user. It is important for the decision-makers, think tanks and the technology developers to assess the need, rationale and importance for the technology before its development and also plan to develop, market and make it reach the end user. During COVID-19, technology has heavily helped the global communities to stay connected, educate themselves, get medical help, conduct business, do governance, and develop ideas and many more. In this background, technology adoption and its acceptance, especially after COVID-19, needs to be investigated in detail. Methodology: Various factors tend to exert their impact on adoption as well as acceptance of the technology among the customers in terms of technological, personal, social, environmental and economic factors. The current study analyses various technology acceptance models in this research paper and its application in various domains such as education, healthcare, agriculture, Fintech, and security. Findings: The current review encompasses a brief discussion of the technology acceptance models while it presented an overview of its applications in various domains, especially after COVID-19 pandemic. This paper has found knowledgeable insights about the impact of COVID-19 upon technology adoption since the pandemic has changed the way how people live, communicate, do business, and thrive. Implications: The study also lists out the scope for future studies due to the advancements in technologies and the increasing penetration of technology across the globe. The future studies must focus on advanced technology adoption models as per the ever-changing environment. Some of the potential application areas must be investigated in detail such as cloud computing, IIoT, Artificial Intelligence, Block chain, Virtual and Augmented reality, Machine Learning (ML) and Deep Learning techniques etc. Originality: Though various studies have reviewed technology acceptance and adoption models, the current study is a first-of-its-kind attempt in the aftermath of COVID-19.


Abdalla, M., Jarrah, M., Abu-Khadrah, A., & Bin Arshad, Y. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption of cyber security standards among public listed companies in Malaysia. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 12(11), 0121191.

Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., & Beckmann, J, editors. BT-Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 11-39.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Asian Development Bank Institute. (2022). Fintech and COVID-19 Impacts, Challenges, and Policy Priorities for Asia. Edited by John Beirne, James Villafuerte, and Bryan Zhang; Asian Development Bank Institute (ADBI); Retrieved from:

Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

Bernardo, E., & Seva, R. (2022). Explanatory Modelling of Factors Influencing Senior Citizen Telehealth Adoption in COVID-19 Pandemic. Vol. 2. RSF Conference Series: Business, Management and Social Sciences. p. 21–29.

Bhookhun, L. (n.d.). COVID-19: Technology Adoption and Adaptation. PWC. Retrieved from:

Billanes, J., & Enevoldsen, P. (2021). A critical analysis of ten influential factors to energy technology acceptance and adoption. Energy Reports, 7, 6899–6907. doi: org/10.1016/j.egyr.2021.09.118

Brar, P. S., Shah, B., Singh, J., Ali, F., & Kwak, D. (2022). Using modified technology acceptance model to evaluate the adoption of a proposed iot-based indoor disaster management software tool by rescue workers. Sensors, 22(5), 1866. doi: org/10.3390/s22051866

Clipper, B. (2020). The influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on technology: Adoption in health care. Nurse Leader, 18(5), 500–503. doi: org/10.1016/j.mnl.2020.06.008

Das, A., & Das, D. (2022). Adoption of fintech services amidst COVID-19 pandemic: Empirical evidence from Assam. Managerial Finance, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). doi: org/10.1108/MF-08-2022-0379; ISSN: 0307-4358; Emerald Publishing Limited

Davis, F. (1985). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems. Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. doi: org/10.2307/249008

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003. doi: org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982

Dissanayake, C. A. K., Jayathilake, W., Wickramasuriya, H. V. A., Dissanayake, U., Kopiyawattage, K. P. P., & Wasala, W. M. C. B. (2022). Theories and models of technology adoption in agricultural sector. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2022, 9258317. doi: org/10.1155/2022/9258317

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, L. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Retrieved from:

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. doi: org/10.2307/30036519

Goodhue, D. L., & Thompson, R. L. (1995). Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 213–236. doi: org/10.2307/249689

Ishaq, E., Bashir, S., Zakariya, R., & Sarwar, A. (2021). Technology acceptance behavior and feedback loop: Exploring reverse causality of TAM in Post-COVID-19 Scenario. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 682507. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.682507

Jimenez, I. A. C., García, L. C. C., Marcolin, F., Violante, M. G., & Vezzetti, E. (2021). Validation of a TAM Extension in agriculture: Exploring the determinants of acceptance of an e-Learning platform. Applied Sciences, 11(10), 4672. doi: org/10.3390/app11104672

Jing, W., & Yang, C. (2022). Factors influencing continuous intention to use telemedicine after the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: An extended technology acceptance model. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 10(12), 1012023. doi: org/10.4236/jss.2022.1012023

Krisdina, S., Dwi Nurhayati, O., & Nugraheni, D. M. K. (2022). Hybrid model based on technology acceptance model (TAM) & information system success model (ISSM) in analyzing the use of E-health. E3S Web Conf, 359, 05003. doi: org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235905003

Lai, P. C. (2017). The literature review of technology adoption models and theories for the novelty technology. Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 14, 21–38. doi: org/10.4301/s1807-17752017000100002

LaMorte, W. W. (2019). The Transtheoretical Model (Stages of Change). Massachusetts: Boston University School of Public Health. p. 9.

Liu, L., & Miguel-Cruz, A. (2022). Technology adoption and diffusion in healthcare at onset of COVID-19 and beyond. Healthcare Management Forum, 35(3), 161–167. doi: org/10.1177/08404704211058842

Masud Rana, G., Hossain, S., & Hasan, M. (2021). Exploration of factors that affect the desire of citizens to adopt e-government services: An empirically study on Bangladesh. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 11, 30–44.

McKinsey and Company. (2020). How COVID-19 has Pushed Companies over the Technology Tipping Point-and Transformed Business Forever. Retrieved from:

McKinsey and Company. (2022). McKinsey Technology Trends Outlook 2022. Retrieved from:

Mohr, S., & Kühl, R. (2021). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Precision Agriculture, 22(6), 1816–1844. doi: org/10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x

Muriithi, P., Horner, D., & Pemberton, L. (2016). Factors contributing to adoption and use of information and communication technologies within research collaborations in Kenya. Information Technology for Development, 22(sup 1), 84–100. doi: org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1121856

Okoroji, V., Lees, N. J., & Lucock, X. (2021). Factors affecting the adoption of mobile applications by farmers: An empirical investigation. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 17(1), 19–29.

Parasuraman, A., & Colby, L. C. (2001). Techno-Ready Marketing. Mumbai: The Free Press.

Park, I., Kim, D., Moon, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., & Bae, S. (2022). Searching for new technology acceptance model under social context: Analyzing the determinants of acceptance of intelligent information technology in digital transformation and implications for the requisites of digital sustainability. Sustainability, 14(1), 579. doi: org/10.3390/su14010579

Puriwat, W., & Tripopsakul, S. (2021). Explaining an adoption and continuance intention to use contactless payment technologies: During the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging Science Journal, 5(1), 434.

Rajesh, S., & Rajhans, M. (2014). A review of evolution of theories and models of technology adoption. IMJ, 6(2), 17–29.

Hannah Ritchie and Max Roser (2017). Technology Adoption. Published online at Retrieved from: ‘’ [Online Resource]

Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations: Modifications of a model for telecommunications. In: Stoetzer, M., & Mahler, A., editors. B-Die Diffusion von Innovationen in der Telekommunikation. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 25–38. doi: org/10.1007/978-3-642-79868-9_2

Rosli, M. S., Saleh, N. S., Ali, A., Abu Bakar, S., & Mohd Tahir, L. (2022). A Systematic review of the technology acceptance model for the sustainability of higher education during the COVID-19 pandemic and identified research gaps. Sustainability, 14(18), 11389. doi: org/10.3390/su141811389

Sadeck, O. (2022). Technology adoption model: Is use/non-use a case of technological affordances or psychological disposition or pedagogical reasoning in the context of teaching during the COVID-19 pandemic period? Frontiers in Education, 7, 906195. doi: org/10.3389/feduc.2022.906195

Sagheer, N., Khan, K. I., Fahd, S., Mahmood, S., Rashid, T., & Jamil, H. (2022). Factors affecting adaptability of cryptocurrency: An application of technology acceptance model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 903473.

Saher, R., & Anjum, M. (2021). Role of technology in COVID-19 pandemic. In: Researches and Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Mitigate Pandemics. United States: Academic Press. pp. 109–138. doi: org/10.1016/B978-0-323-90959-4.00005-5

Şahin, F., & Şahin, Y. L. (2022). Drivers of technology adoption during the COVID-19 pandemic: The motivational role of psychological needs and emotions for pre-service teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 25(2), 567–592. doi: org/10.1007/s11218-022-09702-w

Sahut, J. M., & Lissillour, R. (2023). The adoption of remote work platforms after the Covid-19 lockdown: New approach, new evidence. Journal of Business Research, 154(C), 113345. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.11

Sava, J. A. (2022). Implementation of Emerging Technologies in Companies Worldwide 2021-2022. Statista. Retrieved from:

Shahzad, A., Zahrullail, N., Akbar, A., Mohelska, H., & Hussain, A. (2022). COVID-19’s Impact on fintech adoption: Behavioral intention to use the financial portal. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(10), 428. doi: org/10.3390/jrfm15100428

Sharma, P., Shaikh, A. A., Sao, A., & Rohilla, N. (2022). Using Technology Acceptance Model, Analyzing the Role of Telehealth Services in the Healthcare Industry During COVID-19. Vol. 17. In: 7th International Conference on Embracing Change & Transformation Innovation and Creativity. doi: org/10.24083/apjhm.v17i2.1815

Simon, B. (2001). Wissensmedien im Bildungssektor. Eine Akzeptanzuntersuchung an Hochschulen (Knowledge Media in the Education System: Acceptance Research in Universities). Austria: Vienna University of Economics and Business.

Taherdoost, H. (2018). A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manufacturing, 22, 960–967. doi: org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.03.137

Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

Thompson, R. L., Higgins, C. A., & Howell, J. M. (1991). Personal computing: Toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Quarterly, 15(1), 125–143. doi: org/10.2307/249443

Triandis, H. C. (1977). Subjective culture and interpersonal relations across cultures. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 285(1), 418–434. doi: org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1977.tb29370.x

Tsai, W. H., Wu, Y. S., Cheng, C. S., Kuo, M. H., Chang, Y. T., Hu, F. K., Sun, C. A., Chang, C. W., Chan, T. C., Chen, C. W., Lee, C. C., & Chu, C. M. (2021). A technology acceptance model for deploying masks to combat the COVID-19 pandemic in Taiwan (My Health Bank): Web-based cross-sectional survey study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(4), e27069. doi: org/10.2196/27069

Ugochukwu, A. I., & Phillips, P. W. B. (2018). Technology Adoption by Agricultural Producers: A Review of the Literature BT-from Agriscience to Agribusiness. In: Kalaitzandonakes, N., Carayannis, E. G., Grigoroudis, E., & Rozakis, S., editors. Theories, Policies and Practices in Technology Transfer and Commercialization. Berlin: Springer International Publishing. pp. 361–377. doi: org/10.1007/978-3-319-67958-7_17

Valero, A., & Van Reenen, J. (2021). The Impact of COVID-19 on Technology Adoption. Retrieved from:

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Sciences, 39(2), 273–315. doi: org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. doi: org/10.1287/mnsc.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. doi: org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatraman, S. (2014). Understanding E-government portal use in Rural India: Role of demographic and personality characteristics. Information Systems Journal, 24(3), 249–269.

Walczak, R., Kludacz-Alessandri, M., & Hawrysz, L. (2022). Use of telemedicine technology among general practitioners during COVID-19: A modified technology acceptance model study in Poland. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17), 10937. doi: org/10.3390/ijerph191710937

Yadegari, M., Mohammadi, S., & Masoumi, A. H. (2022). Technology adoption: An analysis of the major models and theories. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management. pp. 1–15. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2022.2071255

Yan, C., Siddik, A. B., Akter, N., & Dong, Q. (2021). Factors influencing the adoption intention of using mobile financial service during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of FinTech. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 13, 1–19.

Yuan, X., Wu, D., & Gayle, D. B. (2022). Technology adoption and COVID-19 pandemic. Data and Information Management, 6(2), 100016. doi: org/10.1016/j.dim.2022.100016




How to Cite

Dr. Arif Anjum. (2023). An Overview of Technology Acceptance and Adoption Models in the aftermath of COVID-19. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 14(1), 01–10. Retrieved from