Business Students’ Perception Owards Social Responsibility and Business Ethics.

Authors

  • Naval Lawande Ph.D Scholar, University of Pune Pune,India,
  • Shubhangi Bhosale Research Associate,

Keywords:

Ethics, Social Responsibility, Decision Making, Business Students

Abstract

In  light  of  innumerable  recent  business  scandals, sensitizing  business  students  to  the  importance  of individual and collective actions seems increasingly warranted. The business students  should not only be provided with opportunities to build business skills, but also to help them to understand the powerful effects that business decisions and actions can have on society and the potential collateral damage they can cause. Unfortunately, business education traditionally has been delivered in a way that emphasizes economic rather than relational impacts which reflects the typical business myopia on short-term goal. Individual   differences  in   ethical ideology  are  believed  to  play  a  key  role  in  decision  making. Business students must first perceive ethics and  social  responsibility  to  be  important  before  their  behaviors  are  likely  to  become  more  ethical  and  reflect  greater  social  responsibility.  However,  little  research  has  been  conducted  concerning  business students  perception  regarding  the  importance  of ethics  and  social  responsibility  as  components  of job decisions. A  critical  step  towards  helping business  students to realize the balance between maximizing the  careers  in  business  and  minimizing behavioral harm is the understanding of ethics and social responsibility. The current study focuses on the research conducted in management colleges to determine the differences among business students gender-wise in first and second year, in the ethical views and personal values. The findings reveal that business students views were not favorably predisposed to believing CSR was important. The relationship between males and female students’ perception towards social responsibility was also examined. Several directions for future research are identified.

References

Abdullah, A.: 1992, Understanding the Malaysian Workforce: Guidelines for Managers (Malaysian Institute of Management, Kuala Lumpur).

Ahmed, M. M., K. Y. Chung and J. W. Eichenseher: 2003, ‘Business Students’ Perceptions of Ethics and Moral Judgment: A Cross-Cultural Study’, Journal of Business Ethics 43, 89–102.

Batten, J.: 1999, ‘Factors Affecting Ethical Management: Comparing a Developed and a Developing Economy’, Journal of Business Ethics 19, 51–59.

Blodgett, J. G., L-C. Lu, G. M. Rose and S. J. Vitell: 2001, ‘Ethical Sensitivity to Stakeholder Interests’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 29(2), 190–202.

Carroll, A. B.: 1996, Business and Society, 3rd Edition (Southwestern Publishing Co., Cincinnati)

Carson, T.: 1993, ‘Friedman’s Theory of Corporate Responsibility’, Business and Professional Ethics Journal 12, 3–32.

Forsyth, D. R.: 1992, ‘Judging the Mortality of Business Practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies’, Journal of Business Ethics 11, 461–470.

Fuxman, L.: 1997, ‘Ethical Dilemmas of Doing Business in Post-Soviet Ukraine’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1273–1282.

Goodwin, J.: 1999, ‘Ethical Judgments Across Cultures: A Comparison between Business Students from Malaysia and New Zealand’, Journal of Business Ethics 18, 267– 281.

Hofstede, G.: 1984, Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values (Sage Publications, Abridged Edition, Beverly Hills/London/New Delhi).

Kraft, K. L. and L. R. Jauch: 1992, ‘The Organizational Effectiveness Menu: A Device for Stakeholder Assessment,’ Mid-American Journal of Business 7– 1(Spring), 18–23.

Singhapakdi, A., K. L. Kraft, S. J. Vitell and K. C. Rallapalli: 1995, ‘The Perceived Importance of Ethics and Social Responsibility on Organizational Effectiveness: A Survey of Marketers’, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 23, 49–56.

Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitell: 1994, ‘Ethical Ideologies of Future Marketers: The Relative Influences of Machiavellianism and Gender’, Journal of Marketing Education Spring, 34–42.

Weaver, K. Mark and O. C. Ferrell. 1977. "The Impact of Corporate Policy on Reported Ethical Beliefs and Behavior of Marketing Practitioners." In Contemporary Marketing Thought. Eds. Barnett A. Greenberg and Danny N. Bellenger. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association Proceedings, 41,477-81.

Wood, Van R., Lawrence B. Chonko, and Shelby D. Hunt. 1986. "Social Responsibility and Personal Success: Are They Incompatible?" Journal of Business Research 14: 193-212.

Zahra, S. A. and M. S. LaTour: 1987, 'Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Effectiveness: A Multivariate Approach', Journal of Business Ethics 6, 459-467.

Downloads

Published

22-12-2021

How to Cite

Naval Lawande, & Shubhangi Bhosale. (2021). Business Students’ Perception Owards Social Responsibility and Business Ethics. Indian Journal of Commerce and Management Studies, 2(2), 12–19. Retrieved from https://ijcms.in/index.php/ijcms/article/view/68

Issue

Section

Articles